Author: Auris Huang Hung

Journal of Psychology and Christianity, Vol. 25(3), Fall 2006, pp. 226-239

Abstract:

Modeling a multi-disciplinary evaluation of psychological concepts for use in cross-cultural settings, this paper presents a psychological, theological, and cultural analysis of the concept of differentiated oneness (and related concepts individuation, differentiation, and boundaries) to examine its theoretical foundations and applicability in counseling Asian American families. After evaluating some of the psychological research among non-Western populations and the theology underlying differentiated oneness, this paper explores how Western and Eastern cultural differences, at the core of which are differing views of self, make direct application of this Western-based psychological principle to Asian Americans problematic. Some implications for Christian counseling are presented.

Author: Johan (Ian) P. Verseveldt

Journal of Psychology and Christianity, Vol. 25(3), Fall 2006, pp. 216-225

Abstract:

This article examines the philosophical presuppositions of EFCT using Browning’s (1987) Christian integrative model. After an introduction of Browning’s model and a brief synopsis of EFCT, the article focuses ont hree of Browning’s integration questions as they relate to EFCT: What does the theory claim as the ultimate meaning and foundation of life?, What does the theory morally obligate us to do?, and What are the fundamental needs and tendencies that this theory purports are foundational to psychological health and survival? These questions are then applied to EFCT.

Author: Frederic C. Craigie, Jr.

I hear voices. Well, I have heard voices. Earlier in my career, my professional journals spoke to me. It would begin with a cheery greeting: “Good morning! How are you this lovely day? Here I am, ready to partner with you in helping you to become a better healer … I look forward to our collaboration.” A week later, unread, the tone would become a little more insistent: “Come come, Dr. Craigie, eleven seconds with the Table of Contents is not enough. You’re paying good money for me and, if I may say so, you need me.” I would sometimes sheepishly mumble something back about too many clients and paperwork and phone messages. The final communication was stark: “YO FRED! How can you be so professionally irresponsible as to consciously neglect my wisdom? SLOTH … that’s what it is, SLOTH … one of the Seven Deadly Sins, right?”

Author: Langberg, Diane
Journal of Psychology and Christianity, Vol. 25(3), Fall 2006, pp. 258-266

Abstract:

As image bearers we reflect, assimilate and are shaped by the forces that surround us. Therapists are profoundly impacted by the suffering and evil with which they sit. We become like that which we habitually reflect. This paper explores the potentially negative impact of therapeutic work and the call of the Scriptures in the life of the Christian therapist to reflect the image of Christ in this world and in our work. Five disciplines are considered as aids in shaping the therapist to reflect the image of Christ: worship, truth, study, prayer and obedience. As these disciplines are pursued, the life of Christ becomes the primary shaping force in the life and work of the therapist thereby bringing his redemptive power to bear in the work of therapy.

Conducted by Gary W. Moon

Journal of Psychology and Christianity, Vol. 25(3), Fall 2006, pp. 267-273

Richard L. Gorsuch is one of the most prolific researchers the integration movement has produced. Since 1979 he has served as a member of the School of Psychology at Fuller Theological Seminary and has become increasingly known for his work in the psychology of religion, substance abuse, social psychology,
and statistics. His first book, Factor Analysis (1983), established his reputation as a research methodologist. Gorsuch, who is a past president of Division 36 of the American Psychological Associations and a William James Award recipient, is an active member of the Religious Research Association, and a fellow of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion and the American Psychological Association. He has served in editorial capacities for journals including Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Educational and Psychological Measurement and has authored and contributed chapters to over 20 books. He is a Diplomate in Assessment and a licensed psychologist doing conflict mediation with churches and other groups and has been listed among the 2000 Outstanding Scholars of the 21st Century by England’s International Biographical Centre.
Gorsuch’s recent book Integrating Psychology and Spirituality: An Introduction has been well-received and will be the focal point for this interview.

Author: Carroll R., M. Daniel.

Journal of Psychology & Christianity, Vol. 25(2), Sum 2006, pp. 169-176

Abstract:

Observers utilizing Freudian and Jungian approaches have given considerable attention to various Old Testament prophets. These efforts represent both the interpretive stances of observing what is behind the text or presented in the text, as well as what is in front of the text. This paper explores the Old Testament prophet as an advocate for justice. Justice is a prophetic theme with strong emotional content. It stems from the prophet’s understanding of who God is and what are the emotions of God in the face of injustice. The article surveys the prophetic emotions as found in the book of Micah and concludes with some suggestions on how biblical and psychological studies could further work together in the area of social justice.

Author: Worthington, Everett L., Jr.

Journal of Psychology & Christianity, Vol. 25 (2), Sum 2006, pp. 155-168

Abstract:

My thesis is that findings from social scientific research can be a valid tool that theologians can use to make stronger theological arguments. I use experimental and basic-research studies of forgiveness and justice to illustrate this thesis. To illustrate, I address a theological issue—N. T. Wright’s (1997) version of the controversial reinterpretation of the doctrine of justification by grace appropriated by faith, which is known as the New Perspective on Paul. Experimental psychology can thus bolster theological arguments as do analysis of biblical texts, analysis of Hebrew and Greek language and linguistics, understanding of historical contexts (including the history of Israel, the church, and surrounding area), conversations with philosophers, theologians, and public intellectuals across situations and time, and even clinical theory.

Author: Averbeck, Richard E.

Journal of Psychology & Christianity, Vol. 25(2), Sum 2006, pp. 111-126

Abstract:

Calvin’s (1960) discussion of “double knowledge” helps us understand the relationship between psychology (knowledge of the human person) and biblical studies/theology (knowledge of God). The double nature of these two forms of knowing illustrates the natural and necessary mutual interaction they have. Neither one is complete in itself; both need the other. We can see this theme throughout the pages of Scripture: in the redemption-sanctification-wisdom strands of theology as well as in the creation-corruption-foolishness teachings of the Bible. True wisdom is bringing the knowledge of God and people together in the midst of the mess which we ate and in which we live. This is what both the Bible and counseling are really all about.

Author: Beck, James R.

Journal of Psychology & Christianity, Vol. 25(2), Sum 2006. pp. 101-110

Abstract:

Before pursuing collaboration between biblical studies and counseling/psychology, scholars must ascertain the appropriateness of the endeavor. The answers to five crucial questions will provide useful information regarding this determination: Can we articulate a theological foundation for the collaboration? Can we find biblical precedent for our collaboration? Does the history of the church contain examples of such efforts? Is there evidence for mutual benefit to both disciplines? And, is such collaboration double?

Author: Siang-Yang Tan.

Journal of Psychology & Christianity, Vol. 25(1), Spr 2006 pp. 68-73

Abstract:

The article discusses the practice of positive psychology being the focus in the studies of the American Psychologist. Positive psychology is the study of positive emotion, character and institutions. Progress in the field had been reported such as empirical validation of interventions. Seligman noted its application in positive prevention and positive therapy.